The original movies following theX-Menmay have adapted the titular mutant heroes into live-action, but they were also full of plot holes that are often ignored. Though themovies featuring the X-Menearned an unfortunate reputation for being inconsistent in terms of quality, they were able to find considerable success at the box office. In a franchise spanning two decades, 13 movies were made based on the mutant heroes of villains of Marvel Comics.
However, the stories that make upFox’s X-Men movie timelinearen’t without their issues. Many of these are well-documented, but some its most glaring narrative mistakes are actually ignored or overlooked. The X-Men movies actually feature a number of plot holes that are regularly missed or otherwise dismissed, though with the franchise now over, they are destined to remain unresolved inconsistences. With that in mind, here are 10 plot holes everyone ignored in the original X-Men movies.

10Magneto’s Forgotten Fame
X-Men: Days of Future Past (2014)
As one of the most complex and powerful mutant characters in Marvel history,Magneto’s greatest X-Men movie and TV momentsstand out as being especially memorable. However, one of them also creates a significant plot hole that complicates the franchise’s overall narrative. InX-Men: Days of Future Past, Magneto puts on an awesome display of power when he lifts an entire stadium into the sky before making a televised address to the world.
However, consideringDays of Future Past’s status as a prequel, Magneto’s actions complicate the timeline considerably.Magneto so clearly announcing himself to the world makes the prequels incompatible with the original movies of the franchise, in which the villains – and mutants in general – are not particularly well-known to the public at large. In fact, Magneto openly attends Robert Kelly’s public announcement of a Mutant Registration Act, so his declaration in the prequels makes very little sense.

9Professor Xavier’s First Class
X-Men: First Class (2011)
The first film in the franchise, 2000’sX-Men, introduced many of Marvel’s most iconic mutants into live-action. In the movie, it is stated that Cyclops, Jean Grey, and Storm were Charles Xavier’s first students, and have helped him develop his school into the safe haven for mutantkind that it is when Wolverine first arrives. However, the franchise’s prequels swiftly cause a major problem with that backstory.
12 X-Men: First Class Characters Ranked By How Useful They Would’ve Been Against Thanos
Some of the battles against Thanos may have gone much, much differently, if a few of these young X-Men from X-Men: First Class had been present.
Thecast ofX-Men: First Classactually serve as Xavier’s first group of mutants, and are shown helping him establish his school.The movie’s title confirms that its roster of heroes – which does not feature Cyclops, Jean Grey, or Storm – are Xavier’s first class, meaning that the context delivered in the originalX-Menmovies was not at all correct. There’s no clear explanation for the plot hole other than a mistaken character or a convenient technicality, and it rather seems to be a simple continuity issue.

8The Stryker Confusion
One of theX-Menfranchise’s more bizarre plot holes stems from a throwaway scene at the end ofX-Men: Days of Future Past. The movie’s time-traveling premise encounters more than a few narrative issues, though its final scene, which sees Mystique posing as William Stryker taking custody of an unconscious Logan, doesn’t initially appear to be a problem. However, the following movie,X-Men: Apocalypse, ignores Mystique’s presence in the scene entirely.
Apocalypsebriefly picks up Wolverine’s story when he is shown breaking free from Stryker’s Weapon X facility.It does nothing to explain what Mystique was doing with Logan at the end ofDays of Future Past, or how the real Stryker was able to reclaim him for the Weapon X project.The way that the franchise immediately disregarded one of its own sequel teases was beyond bizarre, and created a major but often overlooked plot hole.

7The Unkillable Mutant Was Unceremoniously Killed First
X-Men: First Classintroduced several new characters into the live-action franchise, including Armando Muñoz, also known as Darwin. Darwin’s mutant ability is known as adaptive evolution, effectively rendering him unkillable. The movie explains that Darwin is able to instantly adapt to any attack, allowing him to withstand damage that would kill any other person as well as most other mutants. However,First Classthen goes on to disregard its own explanation of Darwin’s powers.
Upon meeting Sebastian Shaw, the X-Men are shocked when he unceremoniously kills Darwin by directing an energy blast at him.The moment that the villain kills an apparently unkillable hero was surprising, but it was a cheap mishandling of the character and didn’t make any real sense.Though it’s far from thesaddest death in the X-Men movie franchise, it did create an unnecessary plot hole around Darwin’s powers.

6Bolivar Trask Hunted The Wrong Mutant
X-Men: Days of Future Pasthas come to be considered one of the best movies of the X-Men prequels, but it’s not without its narrative issues and inconsistencies. The movie sees Bolivar Trask creating the Sentinels, robots made with the sole purpose of hunting mutants.Days of Future Pastalso includes a scene in which Trask explains that he needs Mystique’s DNA to make the Sentinels work, as her adaptability is exactly what he is missing.
10 Harsh Realities Of Rewatching X-Men: Days of Future Past 10 Years After Release
Though X-Men: Days of Future Past adapts a beloved comic book story, it has some big problems as highlighted by rewatching a decade after its release.
The plot hole stems from the fact that Trask clearly has the wrong mutant in mind.Mystique’s shape-shifting ability does not allow her to access the abilities of others, meaning she’s not as adaptable as Trask suggests, and isn’t the mutant he needs. In fact,Days of Future Past’s Rogue Cutexplains that he actually needed Rogue after all, but even this isn’t entirely accurate. The DNA that would have been best suited to the task was Darwin’s, who never should have been killed in the previous movie in the first place.

5Cerebro’s Multiple Origins
One of the most annoying plot holes in the entireX-Menmovie franchise is also one of its most inconsequential. In 2000’sX-Men, it is explained that Magneto is aware of Cerebro’s power, as he helped Xavier build the machine. This is again referenced inX2, when William Stryker allows his son to access the machine. However, Cerebro’s origins are not as straightforward as the original movie suggests.
The release of the 2011 prequel,X-Men: First Class, established that Magneto’s involvement in Cerebro’s construction was minimal.The prequel movies show that Hank McCoy actually designed Cerebro, and Magneto’s only contribution was lifting some of the metal panels into place.There’s nothing inFirst Classto suggest that Magneto had any real understanding of how Cerebro worked or what it could do, rendering the original explanation of its origins especially confusing.

4Wolverine’s Selective Memory Loss
The Wolverine (2013)
When it comes to the characters of theX-Menfranchise,Wolverine’s movie timelineis actually one of the least confusing. Considering the character’s regenerative healing factor and the robust exploration of his origins, his timeline actually makes a considerable amount of sense. That is, until 2013’sThe Wolverine, which establishes a subtle but incredibly frustrating plot hole regarding Logan’s memory loss.
Strangely,The Wolverinesees Logan recall details and people from World War II, long before the loss of his memory. It’s an incredibly convenient lapse of his amnesia that makes no logical sense at all in the context of the franchise.

In all previousX-Menmovies,Logan’s amnesia was a major part of the character’s story.It was explained inX-Men Origins: Wolverine, which offered an explanation of the character’s past and established how he lost his memory. Strangely,The Wolverinesees Logan recall details and people from World War II, long before the loss of his memory. It’s an incredibly convenient lapse of his amnesia that makes no logical sense at all in the context of the franchise.
3Cyclops’ Inconsistent Age
X-Men Origins: Wolverine (2009)
TheX-Menfranchise adapted some characters far better than others, but one that it struggled with in particular was Cyclops. Not only did the movies never quite capture his leadership abilities or his charisma as a mutant hero, but they also failed to give the character a consistent place in the timeline. With three actors appearing as Cyclops at different points in the timeline, theX-Menfranchise’s handling of Scott Summers created a subtle plot hole.
“I Loved The Movie”: James Marsden Addresses Hugh Jackman’s X-Men Return In Deadpool & Wolverine And Whether He’d Return As Cyclops In The MCU
EXCLUSIVE: Former X-Men star James Marsden responds to Hugh Jackmans’s MCU debut in Deadpool & Wolverine and if he may return as Cyclops.
After appearing as a grown man seemingly in his late twenties inX-Menand its two sequels, Cyclops then appeared inX-Men Origins: Wolverine, which was set in the late 1970s, as a high school-aged teen. Not only does this not match the original movie’s timeline, but subsequent prequel movies made Cyclops slightly older again.This makes his appearance in the original movies seem far too young, as he should have been considerably olderby the early ‘00s.

2Wolverine Regained His Adamantium Claws
As Wolverine served as one of theX-Menfranchise’s few core characters, it would seem that consistency regarding his story should have been paramount to maintaining the franchise’s narrative integrity. However, another nagging plot hole that appears within the wider narrative stems from the ending of 2013’sThe Wolverine, in which Logan loses his adamantium claws. The following movie,Days of Future Past, shows a present-day Logan still in possession of his claws, and there is never any further explanation of how he regained them.
Considering the manipulation of the timeline involved in the franchise, there are many plausible explanations for why Wolverine might have adamantium claws inDays of Future Past. Even so,the fact that the franchise offers no canonical explanation for the development is incredibly frustrating, especially as it’s often lost among other more glaring plot holes. To have shown such a major development in the character’s story only to immediately ignore it makes it all the more difficult to swallow.

1Mystique’s Death In Dark Phoenix
Dark Phoenix (2019)
The many issues with the X-Men franchise’s timeline did nothing to help the franchise’s popularity, but one of its worst plot holes came towards its conclusion. 2019’sDark Phoenixwas the last movie in the franchise to follow the X-Men, and featured many developments that were considered hugely underwhelming. One of the more shocking aspects of its story was the death of Mystique, who is killed by Jean Grey, after she is possessed by the Phoenix Force.
ConsideringDark Phoenixis a prequel, this creates a confusing plot hole that effectively breaks the entire timeline of the franchise. Mystique played a major role in the original trilogy of movies, but her death inDark Phoenixmakes that impossible. It’s one of the most unnecessary and thoughtless plot holes in theX-Menmovies, even if it is widely overlooked due to the franchise’s subsequent end.